Continuation of Propliners

This is the place where we can all meet and speak about whatever is on the mind.
new reply
A-26Invader
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 365
Joined: 08 Apr 2010, 21:23
Location: Norco, California

Continuation of Propliners

Post by A-26Invader »

With the development of MSFS and P3D, has A2A discussed ideas about future continuation of old airline products or is this line of products dead? Example would be the Convair 340/440 seeing how it served the medium range fleet and how they are still operated today.

Reason I ask is due to the current development of an Aerostar which would be your first in-depth twin could the current tech be applied to other twins as well?
Last edited by A-26Invader on 27 Sep 2020, 17:50, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImage

clarkejw
Senior Airman
Posts: 197
Joined: 14 Oct 2013, 16:29
Location: Maitland, NSW Australia

Re: Continuation of Propliners

Post by clarkejw »

Good question!

real
Airman First Class
Posts: 71
Joined: 10 Apr 2014, 10:38

Re: Continuation of Propliners

Post by real »

A Convair 540 :D .....

A-26Invader
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 365
Joined: 08 Apr 2010, 21:23
Location: Norco, California

Re: Continuation of Propliners

Post by A-26Invader »

real wrote: 27 Sep 2020, 18:09 A Convair 540 :D .....
Convair 580 with Allison’s!
ImageImageImage

Dogsbody55
Senior Master Sergeant
Posts: 1837
Joined: 26 Aug 2013, 22:03
Location: Perth, W. Aust

Re: Continuation of Propliners

Post by Dogsbody55 »

A-26Invader wrote: 27 Sep 2020, 17:36 With the development of MSFS and P3D, has A2A discussed ideas about future continuation of old airline products or is this line of products dead? Example would be the Convair 340/440 seeing how it served the medium range fleet and how they are still operated today.

Reason I ask is due to the current development of an Aerostar which would be your first in-depth twin could the current tech be applied to other twins as well?
Very much agreed. I'd love to see one of the Convair twins get the COTS treatment. The original 240 might be a better choice insofar as there were more built, more variations and more choice for repainters. However, the bigger 340/440 might be easier to model as the plane was standardised to make production easier. Less choice in door positions etc. The 240 was a smaller plane too so not so good getting out of higher altitude airports with it' shorter wingspan and less powerful R-2800's.

Guess we'll just have to wait and see.


Cheers,
Mike
ImageImageImageImage

real
Airman First Class
Posts: 71
Joined: 10 Apr 2014, 10:38

Re: Continuation of Propliners

Post by real »

A-26Invader wrote: 27 Sep 2020, 18:23
real wrote: 27 Sep 2020, 18:09 A Convair 540 :D .....
Convair 580 with Allison’s!
That's i wanted to say a 580. :oops:

MarcE
Senior Master Sergeant
Posts: 1657
Joined: 27 Jun 2009, 03:39
Location: Southern Germany
Contact:

Re: Continuation of Propliners

Post by MarcE »

CV580 <3 :D

User avatar
AKar
A2A Master Mechanic
Posts: 5230
Joined: 26 May 2013, 05:03

Re: Continuation of Propliners

Post by AKar »

I'd love any properly Accu-Simmed commuter or business aircraft. It does not have to be bush-capable but should do short runways and small airports with relative ease. Maybe an old-school King Air, or Cessna SkyCourier perhaps. It should do both self-loading and bulk/pallet cargo, and be capable of self-sustained operations.

-Esa

new reply

Return to “Pilot's Lounge”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests