C-46
-
- Airman
- Posts: 24
- Joined: 11 Sep 2011, 18:58
Re: C-46
JetRanger where did you get the FSX version?
- Jetranger7
- Senior Airman
- Posts: 214
- Joined: 02 Oct 2011, 11:39
- Location: Kansas City Missouri
- Contact:
Re: C-46
I have the C-46 Commando "PACKAGE", which is the 9th one down , from the TOP of the page - on Simivations web site.
Simivations link here : http://simviation.com/1/search?submit=1 ... &filename=
You'll want this one " FS2004/FSX Curtiss C-46 Commando Package " - by Libardo Guzman. 1.8MB .
Comes complete with Virtual Cockpit, & Cargo bays.
Decent aircraft to fly really - FREEWARE !!
Then I just grabbed some more repaints that are listed on that page,, from the same designer and added them to my Package Fleet, I have like 14 or 15 of them,, now.
Hope that Helps !!
Jetranger
Simivations link here : http://simviation.com/1/search?submit=1 ... &filename=
You'll want this one " FS2004/FSX Curtiss C-46 Commando Package " - by Libardo Guzman. 1.8MB .
Comes complete with Virtual Cockpit, & Cargo bays.
Decent aircraft to fly really - FREEWARE !!
Then I just grabbed some more repaints that are listed on that page,, from the same designer and added them to my Package Fleet, I have like 14 or 15 of them,, now.
Hope that Helps !!
Jetranger
-
- Airman First Class
- Posts: 74
- Joined: 11 Feb 2009, 05:53
Re: C-46
Isn't the C46 a pig to fly? Unlike the DC3 / C47 which was a ni ce airplane to fly?
Think we would be better off with a C47.
Think we would be better off with a C47.
-
- Senior Master Sergeant
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: 25 Mar 2006, 09:22
- Location: Somewhere in the Middle, UK.
- Contact:
Re: C-46
The C-46 is more challenging, with "interesting" crosswind characteristics according to most reports. However, it's the challenge that many people want, rather than an "easy aircraft to fly"... Heck, if it was easy people wanted, they wouldn't fly the B377.
Personally, I think I C-47/DC-3 would prove phenomenally popular. A C-46 would be less so, but would still sell to both warplane and civilian flying enthusiasts as they are still flying in private hands today. Therefore both are more than reasonable suggestions.
Ian P.
Personally, I think I C-47/DC-3 would prove phenomenally popular. A C-46 would be less so, but would still sell to both warplane and civilian flying enthusiasts as they are still flying in private hands today. Therefore both are more than reasonable suggestions.
Ian P.
- Tailspin45
- Staff Sergeant
- Posts: 346
- Joined: 26 Jun 2013, 13:22
- Location: San Diego CA
- Contact:
Re: C-46
About mid-way down my diatribe on taildraggers at http://tailspinstales.blogspot.com/2009 ... agger.html there's a link to an interesting quote from a C-46 pilot who landed on Iwo Jima with a 50kt, 90 degree crosswind. Couldn't be too much of a pig if he managed to do that!DogTailRed2 wrote:Isn't the C46 a pig to fly?
Blue skies and tailwinds
Re: C-46
I'd take any twin as long as it has accusim. As to them letting us know, it's our own fault that they don't, when they mentioned the f4 and star fighter and then said it was on the back burner instead of being like it's okay Scott no worries, we were ready to nail him to a cross. I wish they would give us a little more notice prior to release so capital can be earmarked but hey not my company not my perogative.
Andrew
ASUS ROG Maximus Hero X, Intel i7 8770K, Nvidia GTX 1080, 32GB Corsair Vengeance 3000 RAM, Corsair H90i liquid cooler.
All Accusim Aircraft
Accu-Feel, 3d Lights Redux
ASUS ROG Maximus Hero X, Intel i7 8770K, Nvidia GTX 1080, 32GB Corsair Vengeance 3000 RAM, Corsair H90i liquid cooler.
All Accusim Aircraft
Accu-Feel, 3d Lights Redux
Re: C-46
I would settle for one of them.....
Or maybe one of these....
P61- Black Widow
XB-35
YB-35
YB-49
N9M
Or maybe one of these....
P61- Black Widow
XB-35
YB-35
YB-49
N9M
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 95 guests