Page 1 of 1

Cub vs. Mustang - sim performance (fps)?

Posted: 21 Oct 2018, 02:06
by Zacke
Hey guys,

I've a really modest PC rig but I've got the civ mustang running quite smooth within FSX SE. I also bought the Bonanza, C182 and B17 and that's also the order they perform fps wise.

Do you have any experience how the Cub's performing under the same circumstances?

Thanks in advance,
Zacke

Re: Cub vs. Mustang - sim performance (fps)?

Posted: 21 Oct 2018, 08:54
by AviationAtWar
The Cub will be just fine if you can run these others with no issues.

Re: Cub vs. Mustang - sim performance (fps)?

Posted: 21 Oct 2018, 14:39
by Zacke
Thanks for your reply.

But maybe I wasn't clear enough: The Mustang is performing quite good with my rig and settings. The other mentioned ones not so smooth. For me the question is how's the cub relative to the civilian Mustang?

Thanks again,
Zacke

Re: Cub vs. Mustang - sim performance (fps)?

Posted: 21 Oct 2018, 15:10
by Nick - A2A
Hi Zacke,

The Cub is a comparatively basic aircraft and the Accu-Sim version has a fairly simple virtual cockpit with few click-spots. The performance fps-wise should exceed that of the P-51 Civilian, and it'll certainly outperform the C182 and Bonanza in terms of sim performance, if not 'performance performance'. :)

Thanks,
Nick