We need something new in the name for Accu-Sim
Re: We need something new in the name for Accu-Sim
Accu-Sim XtReEmE
Re: We need something new in the name for Accu-Sim
Accu-Sim-Too
Re: We need something new in the name for Accu-Sim
Having a lot of experience with SEO due to day job, Arabic numerals are definitely the way to go over Roman numerals, which bring up all sorts of issues, so 2 or 2.0 > II.Scott - A2A wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 05:54 Good point but while being fully independent is a big benefit to the developer it has little impact on the customer. I am a bit torn between Accu-Sim 2 and Accu-Sim II, leaning towards Accu-Sim 2.0 if not for anything else but the practicality of having a decimal for future expansion and features.
I suppose there is an opportunity to state the features along with this.
- Scott - A2A
- A2A General
- Posts: 16839
- Joined: 11 Feb 2004, 12:55
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: We need something new in the name for Accu-Sim
We have referred to the newly created physics engine in house as "Merlin." Maybe "Accu-Sim II, Powered by Merlin". Merlin Aerodynamics, Merlin AI, etc.
A2A Simulations Inc.
-
- Airman
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 19 Dec 2016, 13:05
Re: We need something new in the name for Accu-Sim
Merlin? Like the wizard from sword in the stone because it's so magical?Scott - A2A wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 19:20 We have referred to the newly created physics engine in house as "Merlin." Maybe "Accu-Sim II, Powered by Merlin". Merlin Aerodynamics, Merlin AI, etc.
- CAPFlyer
- A2A Aviation Consultant
- Posts: 2241
- Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 12:06
- Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Re: We need something new in the name for Accu-Sim
As in the Rolls-Royce Merlin.FunktasticLucky wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 23:16Merlin? Like the wizard from sword in the stone because it's so magical?Scott - A2A wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 19:20 We have referred to the newly created physics engine in house as "Merlin." Maybe "Accu-Sim II, Powered by Merlin". Merlin Aerodynamics, Merlin AI, etc.
I like the idea of Accu-sim II, powered by Merlin. Simple, sweet, to the point.
Re: We need something new in the name for Accu-Sim
Accu-ImmerSim
-
- Airman First Class
- Posts: 52
- Joined: 05 Sep 2020, 13:01
Re: We need something new in the name for Accu-Sim
Accu-Sim II Limner edition
For all the livery painters out there
For all the livery painters out there
-
- Senior Master Sergeant
- Posts: 1658
- Joined: 27 Jun 2009, 03:39
- Location: Southern Germany
- Contact:
Re: We need something new in the name for Accu-Sim
Accusim Future
Re: We need something new in the name for Accu-Sim
Can't wait to fly this Merlin-powered CommancheScott - A2A wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 19:20 We have referred to the newly created physics engine in house as "Merlin." Maybe "Accu-Sim II, Powered by Merlin". Merlin Aerodynamics, Merlin AI, etc.
(I'll show myself out, sorry )
Re: We need something new in the name for Accu-Sim
Merlin...as in Spitfire, Mustang and P-40F in msfs? Can't wait!
Re: We need something new in the name for Accu-Sim
As I detailed in my long post earlier, names are great, but careful consideration needs to be made. What, then, happens when Accu-Sim III comes? Is it still powered by Merlin? Or will that change at some point too? Will it be powered by Pratt & Whitney? Or by Continental? Or by Duracell?Scott - A2A wrote: ↑29 Dec 2022, 19:20 We have referred to the newly created physics engine in house as "Merlin." Maybe "Accu-Sim II, Powered by Merlin". Merlin Aerodynamics, Merlin AI, etc.
I think the elegance and simplicity of 2 or 2.0 or II is the ticket. A tagline/name is good, and I love the ring of "Powered by Merlin", so I'm not opposed to it. Just think of what might come next, down the line.
Erik Haugan Aasland,
Arendal, Norway
(Homebase: Kristiansand Lufthavn, Kjevik (ENCN)
All the Accusim-planes are in my hangar, but they aren't sitting long enough for their engines to cool much before next flight!
Arendal, Norway
(Homebase: Kristiansand Lufthavn, Kjevik (ENCN)
All the Accusim-planes are in my hangar, but they aren't sitting long enough for their engines to cool much before next flight!
Re: We need something new in the name for Accu-Sim
Accu-Sim 2.0
Every second iteration of anything needs to be a 2.0. Resistance is useless.
Corny... yes, very much on purpose, also but practical - no need to explain too much when told that this and that has been brought up to the latest Accu-Sim 2.X standard.
Besides, why would a new and great, beyond-anything-thus-far thing need to be powered by another...thing?
-Esa
Every second iteration of anything needs to be a 2.0. Resistance is useless.
Corny... yes, very much on purpose, also but practical - no need to explain too much when told that this and that has been brought up to the latest Accu-Sim 2.X standard.
Besides, why would a new and great, beyond-anything-thus-far thing need to be powered by another...thing?
-Esa
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 88 guests