Comanche and Fs2020. What new features would you like to see?

[Rioku]

My only "feature request": I wish it worked in FSEconomy out of the box, which basically just means it should use the same fuel tank configuration and naming as previous incarnations. Getting a new configuration into FSEconomy is always a major pain, especially if it's a plane that's already supported in FSE (and there already is a "Piper PA-24 Comanche (A2A)" in FSE). Owners of a C310 (in FSE) know what I'm talking about.

aurel.jpg

+1

[jeepinforfun]

I would say get rid of the walk-around if need be and add more features that can actually damage the plane, such as gear and tire damage for hard landings and overall wear and tear. spread out other things that can go wrong. I've had way to many flap problems in flight instead of other small things that can go wrong.

[Piper_EEWL]

Please don’t get rid of the walk around. That’s one of the most immersive points of the Accusim birds. I never went into the hangar except for scheduled maintenance (50h or 100h inspections) or when I found something during the walkaround. Just like in real life.

I agree that the flaps maybe were a little fragile in the FSX versions though.

[Les Parson]

My only "feature request": I wish it worked in FSEconomy out of the box, which basically just means it should use the same fuel tank configuration and naming as previous incarnations. Getting a new configuration into FSEconomy is always a major pain, especially if it's a plane that's already supported in FSE (and there already is a "Piper PA-24 Comanche (A2A)" in FSE). Owners of a C310 (in FSE) know what I'm talking about.

aurel.jpg

+1

To your point, was there ever any final resolution to the A2A Bonanza w/ Tip Tanks in FSE? I think not. The tips are simply not recognized unlike the Piper PA-24 Comanche (A2A).

[twsharp12]

My only "feature request": I wish it worked in FSEconomy out of the box, which basically just means it should use the same fuel tank configuration and naming as previous incarnations. Getting a new configuration into FSEconomy is always a major pain, especially if it's a plane that's already supported in FSE (and there already is a "Piper PA-24 Comanche (A2A)" in FSE). Owners of a C310 (in FSE) know what I'm talking about.

aurel.jpg

+1

To your point, was there ever any final resolution to the A2A Bonanza w/ Tip Tanks in FSE? I think not. The tips are simply not recognized unlike the Piper PA-24 Comanche (A2A).

Regarding FSE fuel consumption on from the tip-tanks, FSE made a fix using the following rule a few years ago: https://www.fseconomy.net/forum/fse-ano ... -published

If the submitted fuel is not within what it should be, then the server will calculate the fuel consumption. I've yet to experience any issues with any of the A2A planes since this was implemented.

[Les Parson]

+1

To your point, was there ever any final resolution to the A2A Bonanza w/ Tip Tanks in FSE? I think not. The tips are simply not recognized unlike the Piper PA-24 Comanche (A2A).

Regarding FSE fuel consumption on from the tip-tanks, FSE made a fix using the following rule a few years ago: https://www.fseconomy.net/forum/fse-ano ... -published

If the submitted fuel is not within what it should be, then the server will calculate the fuel consumption. I've yet to experience any issues with any of the A2A planes since this was implemented.

Now I see, said the blind man. Many thanks.