I would like to report that the ACCUSIM CESSNA T182T is inconsistent with the real POH.
For instance the green range for the manifold presure values in real POH is 15-28 but in the accusim Cessna T182T is 15-25.
When at presure altitude 2000 feet, full gross weight and with MP = 20 and RPM = 2200 the TAS is about 137 knots when according to the real POH is should be around 114 knots.
Why is that ?
Operating system WIN7 - 64bit
platform FSX:SE
ACCUSIM CESSNA T182T inconsistency
-
- Senior Master Sergeant
- Posts: 2286
- Joined: 05 Nov 2013, 10:48
- Location: Oksboel, Denmark
Re: ACCUSIM CESSNA T182T inconsistency
The Cessna 182 is not a turbocharged 182, so that could explain the difference on the manifold pressure gauge. I don’t have any explanation on the speed difference
Feel free to move this to the correct forum. There’s a slight inconsistency in posting a 182 matter in the 172 forum
Feel free to move this to the correct forum. There’s a slight inconsistency in posting a 182 matter in the 172 forum
Kind Regards
Tomas
Sim: FSX SE
Accu-Sim aircraft in my hangar:
C172, C182, P51 Civ, P51 Mil, B17, Spitfire, P47, B377 COTS,
J3 Cub, T6, Connie, P-40, V35B
A2A Accu-Sim Avro Lancaster Loading:............0.000003% complete, please wait.
Tomas
Sim: FSX SE
Accu-Sim aircraft in my hangar:
C172, C182, P51 Civ, P51 Mil, B17, Spitfire, P47, B377 COTS,
J3 Cub, T6, Connie, P-40, V35B
A2A Accu-Sim Avro Lancaster Loading:............0.000003% complete, please wait.
- Scott - A2A
- A2A General
- Posts: 16839
- Joined: 11 Feb 2004, 12:55
- Location: USA
- Contact:
Re: ACCUSIM CESSNA T182T inconsistency
Giorgk,giorgk wrote: ↑02 Apr 2020, 12:44 I would like to report that the ACCUSIM CESSNA T182T is inconsistent with the real POH.
For instance the green range for the manifold presure values in real POH is 15-28 but in the accusim Cessna T182T is 15-25.
When at presure altitude 2000 feet, full gross weight and with MP = 20 and RPM = 2200 the TAS is about 137 knots when according to the real POH is should be around 114 knots.
Why is that ?
You are looking at numbers for a T182T, which is a turbocharged version of the 182T (the one we accusimmed). At low altitude a turbocharged engine will produce less horsepower at the same altitude and manifold pressure than a normally aspirated one. And the turbocharged version allows for a higher manifold pressure as well.
Nick just informed me of some inconsistencies aside from this that I'll be testing today.
Scott
A2A Simulations Inc.
Re: ACCUSIM CESSNA T182T inconsistency
Sorry dear Scott,
i thought it was the T182T version. I apologize for that.
Giorgk
i thought it was the T182T version. I apologize for that.
Giorgk
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests