Where's the hook thingy?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_pcSSeowL4[/youtube]
Landing Practice
Landing Practice
Richard
Re: Landing Practice
Well!!! First you normally land from stern to bow because the carrier turns into the wind to take on aircraft so they have the braking effect of the wind.
Secondly this is a spitfire mk1 or mk2 neither of which were fitted with arrester hooks.
Looks like you have set your own huge headwind in order to land.Not realistic i am afraid.
You can do it on a computer but not in real life.
Cheers Chris
Secondly this is a spitfire mk1 or mk2 neither of which were fitted with arrester hooks.
Looks like you have set your own huge headwind in order to land.Not realistic i am afraid.
You can do it on a computer but not in real life.
Cheers Chris
- CodyValkyrie
- VIP Partner
- Posts: 4560
- Joined: 16 Feb 2007, 03:27
- Contact:
Re: Landing Practice
I agree but you must be liberal with theses things.
The adjectives that spring to mind are well perhaps I should stop.
Cheers Chris
The adjectives that spring to mind are well perhaps I should stop.
Cheers Chris
- Lewis - A2A
- A2A Lieutenant Colonel
- Posts: 33320
- Joined: 06 Nov 2004, 23:22
- Location: Norfolk UK
- Contact:
Re: Landing Practice
Thats a damn fine landing, very smooth indeed.
cheers,
Lewis
cheers,
Lewis
A2A Facebook for news live to your social media newsfeed
A2A Youtube because a video can say a thousand screenshots,..
A2A Simulations Twitter for news live to your social media newsfeed
A2A Simulations Community Discord for voice/text chat
A2A Youtube because a video can say a thousand screenshots,..
A2A Simulations Twitter for news live to your social media newsfeed
A2A Simulations Community Discord for voice/text chat
-
- Senior Airman
- Posts: 186
- Joined: 13 Sep 2009, 14:55
- Location: California (Monterey Bay area)
Re: Landing Practice
A very nice landing. You can't argue with success.
On the other hand, an easier, more conventional method would be a swooping, turning approach so that you can see the landing point, leveling out just before touching down. Otherwise, you can't see much except for the nose of the plane.
On the other hand, an easier, more conventional method would be a swooping, turning approach so that you can see the landing point, leveling out just before touching down. Otherwise, you can't see much except for the nose of the plane.
Re: Landing Practice
Agree, and I think I've learned to generally approach most landings that way to resolve the visibility problem, but I've also found that approaching landings from a higher altitude (steeper degree of decline) is easier in the Spitfire for the same reason. Was doing a lot of guessing at the time.computerflyer wrote: On the other hand, an easier, more conventional method would be a swooping, turning approach so that you can see the landing point, leveling out just before touching down. Otherwise, you can't see much except for the nose of the plane.
Here's where I found the carrier (but let's not talk about the first attempt):
https://youtu.be/5V7IoMgYNPo
Richard
- bladerunner900
- Senior Master Sergeant
- Posts: 1991
- Joined: 17 Aug 2008, 14:59
- Location: South Wales
Re: Landing Practice
If you want to try some proper WWII Royal Navy carrier landings, you may be interested in this site.
http://www.flyingstations.com/victorious.html
http://www.flyingstations.com/victorious.html
Re: Landing Practice
Very cool
Andrew
ASUS ROG Maximus Hero X, Intel i7 8770K, Nvidia GTX 1080, 32GB Corsair Vengeance 3000 RAM, Corsair H90i liquid cooler.
All Accusim Aircraft
Accu-Feel, 3d Lights Redux
ASUS ROG Maximus Hero X, Intel i7 8770K, Nvidia GTX 1080, 32GB Corsair Vengeance 3000 RAM, Corsair H90i liquid cooler.
All Accusim Aircraft
Accu-Feel, 3d Lights Redux
Re: Landing Practice
Thanksbladerunner900 wrote:If you want to try some proper WWII Royal Navy carrier landings, you may be interested in this site.
http://www.flyingstations.com/victorious.html
Richard
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests