WOULD ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO SEE A TERRIFIC LATE MODEL WARRIOR III SUCH AS THIS ONE [url]https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=ht ... mrc&uact=8
WOULD FILL A HUGE HOLE I THE FSX MARKET
WARRIOR III
- jeepinforfun
- Technical Sergeant
- Posts: 532
- Joined: 06 Dec 2013, 23:58
Re: WARRIOR III
Not really, the panel is a bit boring and A2A's other Piper offerings fit the bill just fine. After the V-Tail release I would think they will move on to twin engine aircraft.
Take care, Brett
SWLights/AccuFeel/Cub/Mustang/Skyhawk/Cherokee/Skylane/Comanche/Thunderbolt/Spitfire/FlyingFortress/Stratocruiser
SWLights/AccuFeel/Cub/Mustang/Skyhawk/Cherokee/Skylane/Comanche/Thunderbolt/Spitfire/FlyingFortress/Stratocruiser
Re: WARRIOR III
I agree!jeepinforfun wrote:Not really, the panel is a bit boring and A2A's other Piper offerings fit the bill just fine. After the V-Tail release I would think they will move on to twin engine aircraft.
-
- Senior Master Sergeant
- Posts: 1835
- Joined: 26 Aug 2013, 22:03
- Location: Perth, W. Aust
Re: WARRIOR III
Agreed. I don't see the point as we have the Cherokee so well modeled. An Arrow would be more interesting, as it has the same wing as the Warrior III, but could be turbocharged and is a retractable. The change to the tapered wing changed the flight characteristics a little, so that could be interesting, but in general I think it best that A2A move on.
Cheers,
Mike
Cheers,
Mike
-
- Airman Basic
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 09 Jun 2018, 22:54
Re: WARRIOR III
I see how it is quite similar how about if the did a small mod put a newer control column ( A real life mod in many planes) and added a tapered wing
Re: WARRIOR III
With how busy A2A already is and how much work it is to make and test a plane to A2A standards, I can't see how it would makse sense to do, though. Cranking out lots of variants seems more a Carenado specialty. I'd rather A2A keep doing how they're doing.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 42 guests