I don't know, perhaps they might reserve that to the day they basically own the market, should XP11 not gain momentum. But generally speaking, I find either platform's licensing system or misuse of the license unsustainable in the long run.MarcE wrote:Why should they... they haven‘t cared for years about all those youtube-guys competing for the top 10 of „who makes te best NGX tutorial“ using the academical license.
This is the way it is usually done in professional software, yes. How it is done varies.MarcE wrote:How should they even enforce it? Checking the school attendance of every owner of the academical license?
A thought of having a third party suing them for not enforcing their own intellectual rights seems quite idiotic to me, I don't think this ever was an issue.MarcE wrote:And if DTG tried to sue them they would probably roll their eyes at best...
Well, I have done that, while being highly critical of the lack of proper update path with main releases. Kind of foolish by me, financially supporting a platform I find little nice things to speak of while legitimately torrenting DCS major updates for free, the latter doing everything better but being FSX.MarcE wrote:And if they ditched the aca license we‘d have to pay 200$ every two or three years (if we want to be up to date)... wayne... honest people to that anyway.
-Esa