LOL! Newbie RAF Flyboy!
Damn good show old boy, you greased it!
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw-EJUB4CKs[/youtube]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw-EJUB4CKs
Boing Boing!!
Boing Boing!!
Cub. Cherokee. C182. Comanche 250. Spitfire. T-6. B-17. B377. Connie
- WB_FlashOver
- Technical Sergeant
- Posts: 946
- Joined: 10 Jun 2012, 18:23
- Location: (S05) U.S.A.
- Contact:
Re: Boing Boing!!
Thank goodness for good suspension, eh?
-- Fly Well, Be Nice, Have Fun ! ! !
Z390 FTW | i9 9900K @ 5.2 | 32GB 3333 CL14 | 3080 Ti FE
970 Pro 512GB (OS)| 970 Evo 1TB | 850 Evo 500GBx2 Raid0
3TB HDD | Define S2 | EKWB Dual Loop
P51civ - T6 - P40 - B17 - B377 - L049 - Comanche - Spit - Bonanza
Z390 FTW | i9 9900K @ 5.2 | 32GB 3333 CL14 | 3080 Ti FE
970 Pro 512GB (OS)| 970 Evo 1TB | 850 Evo 500GBx2 Raid0
3TB HDD | Define S2 | EKWB Dual Loop
P51civ - T6 - P40 - B17 - B377 - L049 - Comanche - Spit - Bonanza
-
- Airman First Class
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 27 Dec 2017, 19:34
- Location: Lancashire, England
Re: Boing Boing!!
OUCH!
A bit late on the round out, Hoskins!!
Windshear maybe??
I wonder if the poor 146 is flying again?
A bit late on the round out, Hoskins!!
Windshear maybe??
I wonder if the poor 146 is flying again?
- Piper_EEWL
- Chief Master Sergeant
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: 26 Nov 2014, 14:14
- Location: Germany
Re: Boing Boing!!
Holy moly. That was close to a very bad outcome. Reminds me of this one:
https://youtu.be/4c0eaofrdTo
Happy flying
https://youtu.be/4c0eaofrdTo
Happy flying
B377&COTS, J3 Cub, B-17G, Spitfire, P-40, P-51D, C172, C182, Pa28, Pa24, T-6 Texan, L-049&COTS, Bonanza V35B
Re: Boing Boing!!
o come on guys, we all know its was just a landing gear test after some routine maintenance
- Piper_EEWL
- Chief Master Sergeant
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: 26 Nov 2014, 14:14
- Location: Germany
Re: Boing Boing!!
Is that the official statement of the RAF concerning the videostiz wrote:o come on guys, we all know its was just a landing gear test after some routine maintenance
B377&COTS, J3 Cub, B-17G, Spitfire, P-40, P-51D, C172, C182, Pa28, Pa24, T-6 Texan, L-049&COTS, Bonanza V35B
Re: Boing Boing!!
Wonder what kind of damage list this little action resulted in.
-Esa
-Esa
Re: Boing Boing!!
Yeah not good eh!
Actually i just noticed something watching it again....why were the airbrakes below the tail extended on approach!? Is that normal, because as he lands, for the first time, they retract and then deploy again, almost as if he hit the switch to open them (if not auto) which closed them, and then deployed them again when he realized his error?
......Or perhaps he's transferring to be a Navy pilot, and was practicing a Carrier landing
Actually i just noticed something watching it again....why were the airbrakes below the tail extended on approach!? Is that normal, because as he lands, for the first time, they retract and then deploy again, almost as if he hit the switch to open them (if not auto) which closed them, and then deployed them again when he realized his error?
......Or perhaps he's transferring to be a Navy pilot, and was practicing a Carrier landing
Cub. Cherokee. C182. Comanche 250. Spitfire. T-6. B-17. B377. Connie
Re: Boing Boing!!
Yeah, those things fly the approach with the air brake open. I don't know the system logic if there is any automatic retraction, for example if power is added while weight on wheels or having wheel spin something.
-Esa
-Esa
-
- Airman First Class
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 27 Dec 2017, 19:34
- Location: Lancashire, England
Re: Boing Boing!!
I think the pilot retracted the airbrakes prior to landing. How do you try and get out of windshear? Is it power and speed? If so, then retracting those airbrakes would be a good start. Perhaps if he'd used the (fifth) APU too?
The brakes appeared to be retracted just after the Fisher-Price 747 dropped like a rock, as if the crew were reacting to the excessive rate of descent.
Yes the term is a bit derogatory, yet IMHO it's cute, applied to the aircraft itself and in no way applied to any of the 146/RJ rated pilots out there, nor to demean their ability!
The brakes appeared to be retracted just after the Fisher-Price 747 dropped like a rock, as if the crew were reacting to the excessive rate of descent.
Yes the term is a bit derogatory, yet IMHO it's cute, applied to the aircraft itself and in no way applied to any of the 146/RJ rated pilots out there, nor to demean their ability!
Re: Boing Boing!!
LOL! That made me laugh, thanks for the chuckle!HighBypass wrote:Fisher-Price 747 dropped like a rock
Good points man, yeah almost looked like they were about to go around perhaps, but hit the deck instead!! ....then decided to stop and check the gear. Bless em.
Seriously though, interesting that those things use airbrakes like that on approach, I'd never noticed that before.
Cub. Cherokee. C182. Comanche 250. Spitfire. T-6. B-17. B377. Connie
-
- Technical Sergeant
- Posts: 871
- Joined: 29 Jul 2008, 20:20
- Location: Hampton, VA
Re: Boing Boing!!
Most likely was a post maintenance landing gear check. Which now the maintenance guys probably get to throw it up on jacks again and do a hard landing conditional inspection. That is the one thing that makes me glad I work on helicopters instead of airplanes. A hard landing inspection sucks enough having to inspect all the landing gear struts and everything else on a helicopter without having to deal with retractable landing gear.. Takes almost an entire day just to do the inspection. So I can only imaging how bad it must be on one of those things having to tear in to the landing gear just to make sure it is good to go.
S. Jordan
AM; United States Navy
FSX/P3Dc4 Hours: 3100 and counting! All A2A birds in the hangar except the 172.
AM; United States Navy
FSX/P3Dc4 Hours: 3100 and counting! All A2A birds in the hangar except the 172.
-
- Senior Master Sergeant
- Posts: 2438
- Joined: 15 Mar 2016, 08:23
Re: Boing Boing!!
Hi.
The airbrake is normally used on approach and landing , and kept out until after spoilers are deployed , and both airbrake and spoilers slow it down till brakes can be used , then airbrake and spoilers are retracted , i suspect he might have retracted the airbrake just prior to touchdown as he might have been near to stalling due to miss calculation of the wind shear , this aircraft has no reverse thrust or fuel dump system and can take off and land at its full weight , but this landing would certainly result in a heavy landing checks , the wing spar and wing panels are glued together on this aircraft.
regards alan.
The airbrake is normally used on approach and landing , and kept out until after spoilers are deployed , and both airbrake and spoilers slow it down till brakes can be used , then airbrake and spoilers are retracted , i suspect he might have retracted the airbrake just prior to touchdown as he might have been near to stalling due to miss calculation of the wind shear , this aircraft has no reverse thrust or fuel dump system and can take off and land at its full weight , but this landing would certainly result in a heavy landing checks , the wing spar and wing panels are glued together on this aircraft.
regards alan.
-
- Senior Master Sergeant
- Posts: 1835
- Joined: 26 Aug 2013, 22:03
- Location: Perth, W. Aust
Re: Boing Boing!!
I always thought BAE stands for Bring Another Engine. I'm thinking this plane might need more than that after "landing" like that. Three landings for the price of one!!
Cheers.
Mike
Cheers.
Mike
-
- Airman First Class
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 27 Dec 2017, 19:34
- Location: Lancashire, England
Re: Boing Boing!!
Back when BAe built real aeroplanes, they made them strong - 146.... Tornado...
The 146 was designed for shorter, rough airfields wasn't it?
The 146 was designed for shorter, rough airfields wasn't it?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: TreeTops and 28 guests