The A2A Simulations Community

"Come share your passion for flight"
It is currently Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:21 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:05 am 
Offline
Senior Airman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 187
Location: Belgrade
As long as noone died, everything is ok. It is like they say to parents in children camps: "As long as your child is found in the end, we will not tell you how many times we had to call search-and-rescue". As long as the plane doesn't crash, it doesn't matter how many times it almost crashed.

_________________
Владимир Левков/Vladimir Levkov

Aviation is proof that,given the will,we have the capacity to achieve the impossible


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:35 am 
Offline
Staff Sergeant
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:26 pm
Posts: 277
Location: GMT+10
There's a vacant captains job at Aeroflot. Interested? :mrgreen:

_________________
POTR
"Only birds and fools fly and even the birds don't fly at night"
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 06, 2012 10:56 am 
Offline
Senior Airman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 187
Location: Belgrade
Always!I'll have to wait another 5-6 years, though...University and pilot training take time....

_________________
Владимир Левков/Vladimir Levkov

Aviation is proof that,given the will,we have the capacity to achieve the impossible


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 12:39 pm 
Offline
Master Sergeant

Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 1:25 am
Posts: 1018
Don't confuse the type of contamination either. They get a lot of "dry" snow over there, compared to the "wet" snow over here, so it was probably deemed that it was not a factor. "Dry" snow won't stick or affect the airflow over the wings, unlike "wet" snow that will form ice at the surface.

There have been plenty of accidents in the US/Europe involving ice on the wings over the years. I can't think of many Russian airliners that crashed due to that particular problem - the Russians live in that environment and have far more experience with it.

Best regards,
Robin.

_________________
A2A/AccuSim. 'nuff said!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:33 pm 
Offline
VIP Partner
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:27 am
Posts: 3396
Seen things like this when I lived in Alaska..... but anyways.

_________________
ImageImage
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:51 pm 
Offline
Master Sergeant
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 12:06 pm
Posts: 1031
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
VulcanB2 wrote:
Don't confuse the type of contamination either. They get a lot of "dry" snow over there, compared to the "wet" snow over here, so it was probably deemed that it was not a factor. "Dry" snow won't stick or affect the airflow over the wings, unlike "wet" snow that will form ice at the surface.


There is no confusion. The regulations clearly state that *ANY* contamination must be removed. Experience doesn't mean a thing. The rules are the rules and you follow them. Period.

Personally, I don't care what you guys have seen in the past or where. Anyone in the US, Canada, or Europe who flies with any contamination on the wing is doing so ILLEGALLY. If they're flying under private rules, then it's unlikely they'll get caught or any penalties put upon them unless they kill someone other than themselves, but if you're being paid to fly passengers or cargo, you agree by that very pilot certificate to conduct yourself in a professional manner and to follow all the regulations, whether you like them or not. The regulations require that the top ALL flight surfaces be free of contamination of any kind except for small amounts of frost on very specific areas depending on aircraft type and it's not an option. There's no arguing or disagreeing about it. It's written in stone and the report out of the Russian Air Ministry proves that it's the case even for Russia.

As for aircraft in Russia or the Eastern Bloc crashing due to icing - look about 2/3 down the link provided above. The following crashes are listed -

Quote:
22.11.75, Balkan Bulgarian Airlines, Antonov An-24, LZ-ANA, Sofia-Vrazhdebna Airport (3 Fatal)
09.03.00, Vologda AP, Yak-40, RA-88170, Sheremetyevo Airport (9 Fatal)


I suspect this is not a complete list as the Soviet era accident statistics and reports are notoriously incomplete with many accidents simply being ignored.

Planes have crashed due to icing and snow accumulation, many on takeoff. The regulations are there for a reason - they were written in blood.

_________________
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:04 pm 
Offline
Master Sergeant

Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 1:25 am
Posts: 1018
CAPFlyer wrote:
VulcanB2 wrote:
Don't confuse the type of contamination either. They get a lot of "dry" snow over there, compared to the "wet" snow over here, so it was probably deemed that it was not a factor. "Dry" snow won't stick or affect the airflow over the wings, unlike "wet" snow that will form ice at the surface.


There is no confusion. The regulations clearly state that *ANY* contamination must be removed. Experience doesn't mean a thing. The rules are the rules and you follow them. Period.

Not sure how to take that comment. You are correct - follow the law. We are talking about Russia however.

Let's say the jet is cold soaked. Let's say the snow was the dry stuff - not sticky as is commonly found in the US/Europe - and the OAT is presently 25 C below freezing. Not much chance of ice - it must be in a liquid state to form, which it wasn't prior to hitting the wing.

Best regards,
Robin.

_________________
A2A/AccuSim. 'nuff said!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 6:15 pm 
Offline
Master Sergeant
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 12:06 pm
Posts: 1031
Location: Dallas, Texas, USA
Read the link. The Russian Air Ministry clearly states that they follow the ICAO standards. Snow is contamination. Thus it must be removed. Period.

_________________
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:07 pm 
Offline
Master Sergeant

Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 1:25 am
Posts: 1018
CAPFlyer wrote:
Read the link. The Russian Air Ministry clearly states that they follow the ICAO standards. Snow is contamination. Thus it must be removed. Period.

Ahh! In that case then...... :?

Best regards,
Robin.

_________________
A2A/AccuSim. 'nuff said!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group