unrealistic flight behavior

Post any technical issues here. This forum gets priority from our staff.
JamieKugelmann
Senior Airman
Posts: 141
Joined: 06 Jun 2013, 01:23
Location: Australia

unrealistic flight behavior

Post by JamieKugelmann »

Hello

I have been playing around with the L-049 a bit, and I found a weird bug.
When in cruise, I turned the mixture to idle-cutoff on all four engines. The RPM remained high since the props were windmilling, but the flight controls suddenly didn't work! The plane was completely uncontrollable with the mixture in the cutoff position. As soon as I placed the mixture to auto lean, the flight controls began working again.
Cirrus SR20 pilot based out of YMMB - Moorabbin Airport, Victoria, Australia.

User avatar
mallcott
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 455
Joined: 13 Nov 2016, 12:19
Location: UK

Re: unrealistic flight behavior

Post by mallcott »

Booster pumps for the hydraulic assist on the controls need engine power, not simply rotating props.

JamieKugelmann
Senior Airman
Posts: 141
Joined: 06 Jun 2013, 01:23
Location: Australia

Re: unrealistic flight behavior

Post by JamieKugelmann »

mallcott wrote:Booster pumps for the hydraulic assist on the controls need engine power, not simply rotating props.
I'm not sure how that works, since everything in the engine is turning as one.
Cirrus SR20 pilot based out of YMMB - Moorabbin Airport, Victoria, Australia.

AviationAtWar
Technical Sergeant
Posts: 899
Joined: 30 Nov 2014, 19:07
Location: US
Contact:

Re: unrealistic flight behavior

Post by AviationAtWar »

If the crankshaft is turning then the hydraulic pump is turning.

JamieKugelmann
Senior Airman
Posts: 141
Joined: 06 Jun 2013, 01:23
Location: Australia

Re: unrealistic flight behavior

Post by JamieKugelmann »

AviationAtWar wrote:If the crankshaft is turning then the hydraulic pump is turning.
Precisely.
Cirrus SR20 pilot based out of YMMB - Moorabbin Airport, Victoria, Australia.

User avatar
CAPFlyer
A2A Aviation Consultant
Posts: 2241
Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 12:06
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA

Re: unrealistic flight behavior

Post by CAPFlyer »

What did the hydraulic pressure gauges say?
Image

User avatar
cflord
Chief Master Sergeant
Posts: 2744
Joined: 30 Dec 2004, 17:07
Location: Powder Springs, Georgia USA

Re: unrealistic flight behavior

Post by cflord »

If the prop is rotating, the engine is rotating, and if the engine is rotating the hydraulic is rotating and should be putting out hydraulic pressure based on how fast the engine and prop are rotating. They are all directly interconnected with each other. Like CAP asked; what was your hydraulic pressure gauge reading? If the engine/prop is rotating at a higher RPM the hydraulic pressure may be near normal. If the engine/prop is rotating at a lower RPM, then the hydraulic pressure may be lower than normal or non-existent depending on just how low the RPM is. The hydraulic pump is connected to the accessory drive on the back of the engine. The RPM of a windmilling engine (not running) is directly dependent on airspeed. Remember, a windmilling engine (not running) is nothing but pure aerodynamic drag and should be "Feathered", unless a greater emergency exists.

Keep the shiny side up and the dirty side down!

Ret SMSgt Cliff Lord - C-130 Flight Engineer & Mechanic :)

Tobus75
Senior Airman
Posts: 226
Joined: 10 Aug 2014, 06:17
Contact:

Re: unrealistic flight behavior

Post by Tobus75 »

I'd be intersted in your hydraulic pressure gauge readings too.
And what would be the result on controls and that gauge when also feathering the props.
Image

alan CXA651
Senior Master Sergeant
Posts: 2439
Joined: 15 Mar 2016, 08:23

Re: unrealistic flight behavior

Post by alan CXA651 »

Hi.
Remember , if you loose hyd pressure , the control boosters MUST BE DISENGAUGED , to go to manual controls , they will be heavy and only move about half the distance on the peddles/column/wheel , but you can then at least control the aircraft to some degree.
regards alan. 8)
Image
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
WB_FlashOver
Technical Sergeant
Posts: 946
Joined: 10 Jun 2012, 18:23
Location: (S05) U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: unrealistic flight behavior

Post by WB_FlashOver »

JamieKugelmann wrote:The plane was completely uncontrollable with the mixture in the cutoff position. As soon as I placed the mixture to auto lean, the flight controls began working again.
The engines will not start with windmill effect in auto-lean. They will however start with windmill effect in auto-rich. So, I think his point is that why do they work in auto-lean (engines not running) and not work in cut-off (engines not running). I'm curious about hydraulic pressures too but it may be that there is something in the code that says "if levers are in cut-off then hydraulic no worky".

Roger
-- Fly Well, Be Nice, Have Fun ! ! !

Z390 FTW | i9 9900K @ 5.2 | 32GB 3333 CL14 | 3080 Ti FE
970 Pro 512GB (OS)| 970 Evo 1TB | 850 Evo 500GBx2 Raid0
3TB HDD | Define S2 | EKWB Dual Loop


P51civ - T6 - P40 - B17 - B377 - L049 - Comanche - Spit - Bonanza

JamieKugelmann
Senior Airman
Posts: 141
Joined: 06 Jun 2013, 01:23
Location: Australia

Re: unrealistic flight behavior

Post by JamieKugelmann »

Sorry, I have just tested it again.
Hydraulic pressure in the green as suspected.
Windmill engine start to auto rich allows movement of flight controls once engines fire. Once they are not firing, but windmilling at max rpm, the flight controls are not able to be moved.
Cirrus SR20 pilot based out of YMMB - Moorabbin Airport, Victoria, Australia.

User avatar
WB_FlashOver
Technical Sergeant
Posts: 946
Joined: 10 Jun 2012, 18:23
Location: (S05) U.S.A.
Contact:

Re: unrealistic flight behavior

Post by WB_FlashOver »

Well that changes things a bit. While attempting to learn and understand the fuel transfer system I ended up with engine 2 windmilling on me. I was only getting 500 RPM under windmill effect. I did not look at hydraulic pressure, however I would really doubt that 500 RPM is enough to produce the required pressure/volume for flight controls.
-- Fly Well, Be Nice, Have Fun ! ! !

Z390 FTW | i9 9900K @ 5.2 | 32GB 3333 CL14 | 3080 Ti FE
970 Pro 512GB (OS)| 970 Evo 1TB | 850 Evo 500GBx2 Raid0
3TB HDD | Define S2 | EKWB Dual Loop


P51civ - T6 - P40 - B17 - B377 - L049 - Comanche - Spit - Bonanza

LostSoul
Airman
Posts: 34
Joined: 06 Jan 2017, 07:48

Re: unrealistic flight behavior

Post by LostSoul »

To me it seems that the Hydraulic System is not thoroughly implemented. Look at the Hydraulic Pumps Warnings Lights when the engins are on low RPM. They are all illuminated. Nevertheless both Hydraulic Gauges read normal pressure.

SISU
Airman Basic
Posts: 4
Joined: 19 Jan 2017, 10:23
Location: Switzerland

Re: unrealistic flight behavior

Post by SISU »

LostSoul wrote:To me it seems that the Hydraulic System is not thoroughly implemented. Look at the Hydraulic Pumps Warnings Lights when the engins are on low RPM. They are all illuminated. Nevertheless both Hydraulic Gauges read normal pressure.
Seems to be true, I've made an on-ground test yesterday:
1) Started all engines, idling at 1000RPM, hydraulic pump warning lights on -> hydraulic pressure gauge reading at around 1700 lb/sq in. -> flaps & flight controls moving normally
2) Shut-off all 4 hydraulic valve switches, hydraulic pump warning lights on -> hydraulic pressure gauge still reading at around 1700 lb/sq in. -> flight controls moving normally (shouldn't they stop moving with boosters on and no hyd press?) but flaps won't move
3) Turned on 1 hydraulic valve switch -> hydraulic pressure gauge still reading at around 1700 lb/sq in. -> flight controls moving normally and flaps moving veeeery slowly
4) Turned on 1 more hydraulic valve Switch (now 2 out of 4) -> hydraulic pressure gauge still reading at around 1700 lb/sq in. -> flight controls moving normally and flaps moving slowly (about half speed as when all hyd pumps are turned on).

Am I misinterpreting something, or is it possible that there are few bugs within the hydraulic system? And by the way, great work on the connie, I love it! :D
Matthew

CONNIE CAPTAIN

Hobart Escin

Re: unrealistic flight behavior

Post by Hobart Escin »

SISU wrote:
LostSoul wrote:To me it seems that the Hydraulic System is not thoroughly implemented. Look at the Hydraulic Pumps Warnings Lights when the engins are on low RPM. They are all illuminated. Nevertheless both Hydraulic Gauges read normal pressure.
Seems to be true, I've made an on-ground test yesterday:
1) Started all engines, idling at 1000RPM, hydraulic pump warning lights on -> hydraulic pressure gauge reading at around 1700 lb/sq in. -> flaps & flight controls moving normally
2) Shut-off all 4 hydraulic valve switches, hydraulic pump warning lights on -> hydraulic pressure gauge still reading at around 1700 lb/sq in. -> flight controls moving normally (shouldn't they stop moving with boosters on and no hyd press?) but flaps won't move
3) Turned on 1 hydraulic valve switch -> hydraulic pressure gauge still reading at around 1700 lb/sq in. -> flight controls moving normally and flaps moving veeeery slowly
4) Turned on 1 more hydraulic valve Switch (now 2 out of 4) -> hydraulic pressure gauge still reading at around 1700 lb/sq in. -> flight controls moving normally and flaps moving slowly (about half speed as when all hyd pumps are turned on).

Am I misinterpreting something, or is it possible that there are few bugs within the hydraulic system? And by the way, great work on the connie, I love it! :D
If in fact A2A have indeed modeled a simplified hydraulics model on the Constellation as it appears they have, all I can say that is I'm both surprised and disappointed. A2A are a very talented group of individuals with high personal standards and 'cutting corners' like this is beneath them in my opinion.

new reply

Return to “Lockheed Model 049 Tech Support”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests