Hi.
The Connie L049 according to different sites visited state the connie L049 could carry between 60 and 81 passengers and in close order seating up to 105 , yet the A2A carries a max of 44 passengers , could someone at A2A please inform me as to why you chose 44 as the max number and where this info came from , so i can inform my VA management they have the wrong figures , as they are quoting 60 to 81 .
regards alan.
Question about pax
Re: Question about pax
Looks like the original design requested by TWA wa for 40 passengers. https://www.globalsecurity.org/military ... /l-049.htm
MSFS 2020
ATC by PF3
ATC by PF3
- CAPFlyer
- A2A Aviation Consultant
- Posts: 2241
- Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 12:06
- Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Re: Question about pax
I also question the sites that say an L-049 can carry 105 passengers in anything other than sitting on the floor stacked knee to knee. Even 80 seems a bit high considering the size of the cabin. 60 might be possible in some configurations, but that would have been late in life with more modern seats than originally delivered.
Also, understand that a lot of sites confuse the L-049, L-749, and L-1049 and will randomly give you stats from each of the major series of Connie.
Also, understand that a lot of sites confuse the L-049, L-749, and L-1049 and will randomly give you stats from each of the major series of Connie.
-
- Senior Master Sergeant
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: 15 Mar 2016, 08:23
Re: Question about pax
Hi Capflyer.
I have to agree with you that these figures seem excessive and think 44 to 50 might be right amount , just asking where the figure of 44 came from so i can argue my case with my VA that they have figures that are too high , with some firm evidence , as the figures they quote seem to come from wikipedia , and i have so far been unable to find a definative number of pax for the L049 connie.
regards alan.
I have to agree with you that these figures seem excessive and think 44 to 50 might be right amount , just asking where the figure of 44 came from so i can argue my case with my VA that they have figures that are too high , with some firm evidence , as the figures they quote seem to come from wikipedia , and i have so far been unable to find a definative number of pax for the L049 connie.
regards alan.
- Nick - A2A
- A2A Captain
- Posts: 13769
- Joined: 06 Jun 2014, 13:06
- Location: UK
Re: Question about pax
Alan,
Glancing over accident statistics for the L-049 should give you a (rather poignant) snapshot of how the number of souls carried varried over the decades. During the 1940s and 1950s, it seems it was typical for the number of persons on board to be in the 35-50 range. However, once we reach the 1960s, we start to see accidents where the total death toll was in the high 70s orâ€â€in one caseâ€â€85. Additional info here on Wiki.
Presumably the more luxurious cabin layouts of the 40s and 50s had given way to higher density configurations by the 1960s. In other words, there's no such thing as a "definite" passenger capacity.
Cheers,
Nick
Glancing over accident statistics for the L-049 should give you a (rather poignant) snapshot of how the number of souls carried varried over the decades. During the 1940s and 1950s, it seems it was typical for the number of persons on board to be in the 35-50 range. However, once we reach the 1960s, we start to see accidents where the total death toll was in the high 70s orâ€â€in one caseâ€â€85. Additional info here on Wiki.
Presumably the more luxurious cabin layouts of the 40s and 50s had given way to higher density configurations by the 1960s. In other words, there's no such thing as a "definite" passenger capacity.
Cheers,
Nick
Re: Question about pax
I was a VA member for years, but not anymore. I would just send them an email and tell them that the aircraft you are flying has a seat capacity of 48, and that's that. I am sure they don't know squat about the L 049.alan CXA651 wrote:Hi Capflyer.
I have to agree with you that these figures seem excessive and think 44 to 50 might be right amount , just asking where the figure of 44 came from so i can argue my case with my VA that they have figures that are too high , with some firm evidence , as the figures they quote seem to come from wikipedia , and i have so far been unable to find a definative number of pax for the L049 connie.
regards alan.
MSFS 2020
ATC by PF3
ATC by PF3
-
- Senior Master Sergeant
- Posts: 2439
- Joined: 15 Mar 2016, 08:23
Re: Question about pax
Hi.
Just found this artical , that backs up A2A choice of 44 pax , now i have the evedence i need to show the VA.
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j ... u7PWkxKkmQ
regards alan.
Just found this artical , that backs up A2A choice of 44 pax , now i have the evedence i need to show the VA.
https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j ... u7PWkxKkmQ
regards alan.
Re: Question about pax
FWIW, this TWA timetable states 41 punters (bottom left):
http://www.timetableimages.com/ttimages ... 4606-3.jpg
This is not to say that our hosts are 'wrong' with 44, because there are plenty of ways to layout the cabin. Just that 60-80 is... generous.
http://www.timetableimages.com/ttimages ... 4606-3.jpg
This is not to say that our hosts are 'wrong' with 44, because there are plenty of ways to layout the cabin. Just that 60-80 is... generous.
Cub, Cherokee, Comanche, Civvie 'stang, P-40, B-377 COTS, Spitfire, Connie, T-6, C-172, C-182, D-III, Anson, F4U
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests