St Barts Landing

The "Queen of the Skies"
new reply
User avatar
ratty
Technical Sergeant
Posts: 902
Joined: 29 Oct 2013, 21:08
Location: KPMP

St Barts Landing

Post by ratty »

1,200 gallons, 44pax. Odd noises from the back right after touchdown.

https://youtu.be/g5YV7mV7PUM
Last edited by ratty on 09 Feb 2017, 03:18, edited 1 time in total.
Image

User avatar
gulredrel
Master Sergeant
Posts: 1281
Joined: 12 Jun 2011, 02:11
Location: Germany

Re: St Barts Landing

Post by gulredrel »

FE is constantly flapping some switches in fear :mrgreen: Or somebody loaded a grandfather clock (hope that'S the right term for the German "Standuhr") in the back.
"Give me a ping, Vasili. One ping only, please."

Stratocruiser2
Senior Airman
Posts: 160
Joined: 14 Feb 2016, 06:35
Location: Wales

Re: St Barts Landing

Post by Stratocruiser2 »

ratty wrote:1,200 gallons, 44pax. Odd noises from the back right after touchdown.

https://youtu.be/g5YV7mV7PUM
Dive approach over the hill onto 10 or curved approach to 28?

Bill

Edit: Ooops, missed the video link on the post!
Last edited by Stratocruiser2 on 09 Feb 2017, 05:36, edited 2 times in total.

alan CXA651
Senior Master Sergeant
Posts: 2439
Joined: 15 Mar 2016, 08:23

Re: St Barts Landing

Post by alan CXA651 »

Hi.
Considdering that runway is short and steep approach , a soft landing is impossible , but that looked like a safe but firm landing , well done .
regards alan. 8)
Image
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
ratty
Technical Sergeant
Posts: 902
Joined: 29 Oct 2013, 21:08
Location: KPMP

Re: St Barts Landing

Post by ratty »

gulredrel wrote:FE is constantly flapping some switches in fear :mrgreen: Or somebody loaded a grandfather clock (hope that'S the right term for the German "Standuhr") in the back.
It must be the clock. I can't imagine my crew being nervous about my flying.
Image

User avatar
DHenriques_
A2A Chief Pilot
Posts: 5711
Joined: 27 Mar 2009, 08:31
Location: East Coast United States

Re: St Barts Landing

Post by DHenriques_ »

ratty wrote:1,200 gallons, 44pax. Odd noises from the back right after touchdown.

https://youtu.be/g5YV7mV7PUM
Nice film. I know that approach. It can indeed be tricky.

One thing I noticed on the thread. I've commented below just for general information.

I did extensive testing on the issue of raising flaps after touchdown during the seventies for flight instructor seminars. Our findings were that although there was much argument at the time (and still is for that matter :-))) about flap retraction adding brake effectiveness, the resulting loss of drag from raising them immediately after touchdown coupled with the danger of inadvertent gear retraction on retracts outweighed any benefit.
For an aircraft the size of a Connie I’d be looking for these factors to be even more pertinent.
My advice has always been to leave the flaps alone until exiting the runway OR when and if a go around becomes necessary and retraction to a max lift intermediate position is specified by manufacturer’s procedures.
Just a data point.

User avatar
ratty
Technical Sergeant
Posts: 902
Joined: 29 Oct 2013, 21:08
Location: KPMP

Re: St Barts Landing

Post by ratty »

DHenriquesA2A wrote:
ratty wrote:1,200 gallons, 44pax. Odd noises from the back right after touchdown.

https://youtu.be/g5YV7mV7PUM
Nice film. I know that approach. It can indeed be tricky.

One thing I noticed on the thread. I've commented below just for general information.

I did extensive testing on the issue of raising flaps after touchdown during the seventies for flight instructor seminars. Our findings were that although there was much argument at the time (and still is for that matter :-))) about flap retraction adding brake effectiveness, the resulting loss of drag from raising them immediately after touchdown coupled with the danger of inadvertent gear retraction on retracts outweighed any benefit.
For an aircraft the size of a Connie I’d be looking for these factors to be even more pertinent.
My advice has always been to leave the flaps alone until exiting the runway OR when and if a go around becomes necessary and retraction to a max lift intermediate position is specified by manufacturer’s procedures.
Just a data point.
Dudley:

Thanks for the nudge. When I was learning, many decades ago, we always raised the flaps AFTER exiting the active. Somewhere along the line I've picked up the habit of raising the flaps right after I get solid ground contact, without considering the specific situation. In this case, I think I'd have been better off retaining the flap drag rather than relying entirely on the (indifferent) wheel brakes.
Image

User avatar
DHenriques_
A2A Chief Pilot
Posts: 5711
Joined: 27 Mar 2009, 08:31
Location: East Coast United States

Re: St Barts Landing

Post by DHenriques_ »

ratty wrote:
DHenriquesA2A wrote:
ratty wrote:1,200 gallons, 44pax. Odd noises from the back right after touchdown.

https://youtu.be/g5YV7mV7PUM
Nice film. I know that approach. It can indeed be tricky.

One thing I noticed on the thread. I've commented below just for general information.

I did extensive testing on the issue of raising flaps after touchdown during the seventies for flight instructor seminars. Our findings were that although there was much argument at the time (and still is for that matter :-))) about flap retraction adding brake effectiveness, the resulting loss of drag from raising them immediately after touchdown coupled with the danger of inadvertent gear retraction on retracts outweighed any benefit.
For an aircraft the size of a Connie I’d be looking for these factors to be even more pertinent.
My advice has always been to leave the flaps alone until exiting the runway OR when and if a go around becomes necessary and retraction to a max lift intermediate position is specified by manufacturer’s procedures.
Just a data point.
Dudley:

Thanks for the nudge. When I was learning, many decades ago, we always raised the flaps AFTER exiting the active. Somewhere along the line I've picked up the habit of raising the flaps right after I get solid ground contact, without considering the specific situation. In this case, I think I'd have been better off retaining the flap drag rather than relying entirely on the (indifferent) wheel brakes.
You can still find many pilots out here who were taught to raise them.
St Barts has bitten many a good pilot. I've been in there with two types; a Cherokee 6 and a Mustang. Both times were hairy. You have to cut that hilltop close or be too high. If your
over the fence speed is 5 kts too fast you could be in for a go around or a bath. :-)
DH

User avatar
metaldesk44
Airman
Posts: 44
Joined: 12 Dec 2014, 07:33
Location: MN, USA

Re: St Barts Landing

Post by metaldesk44 »

DHenriquesA2A wrote:
ratty wrote:1,200 gallons, 44pax. Odd noises from the back right after touchdown.

https://youtu.be/g5YV7mV7PUM
Nice film. I know that approach. It can indeed be tricky.

One thing I noticed on the thread. I've commented below just for general information.

I did extensive testing on the issue of raising flaps after touchdown during the seventies for flight instructor seminars. Our findings were that although there was much argument at the time (and still is for that matter :-))) about flap retraction adding brake effectiveness, the resulting loss of drag from raising them immediately after touchdown coupled with the danger of inadvertent gear retraction on retracts outweighed any benefit.
For an aircraft the size of a Connie I’d be looking for these factors to be even more pertinent.
My advice has always been to leave the flaps alone until exiting the runway OR when and if a go around becomes necessary and retraction to a max lift intermediate position is specified by manufacturer’s procedures.
Just a data point.
Interesting, I only got in the habit of immediately raising flaps after watching a old video about the B-17. I guess i will have to rethink that!
Image

Image Image

ResidentEVO
Airman
Posts: 15
Joined: 17 Dec 2016, 07:49

Re: St Barts Landing

Post by ResidentEVO »

You flew a P-51 into St Barts?!

User avatar
DHenriques_
A2A Chief Pilot
Posts: 5711
Joined: 27 Mar 2009, 08:31
Location: East Coast United States

Re: St Barts Landing

Post by DHenriques_ »

ResidentEVO wrote:You flew a P-51 into St Barts?!
Yes. You DO know I'm talking about the simulator ? LOL
And the Cherokee was a 180 not a 6. Sorry .

For the real Mustang, assuming you got the good word from Tradewinds Aviation, (you need to be signed off) a 51 in there poses no big issues really. You're a bit hot but it's doable in a civilian configured Mustang at around 9000lbs GW in 2000 ft leaving the flaps down at 50 and using some brakes.

DH

User avatar
CAPFlyer
A2A Aviation Consultant
Posts: 2241
Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 12:06
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA

Re: St Barts Landing

Post by CAPFlyer »

Texas Flying Legends took their fleet down there, but no one was balls enough to actually try touching down. The show of them making high speed passes down the line and the runway was a much better show anyway. :)

"The Movie"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcpRYMa ... D&index=12

"From the Cockpit"
https://youtu.be/CcmE7QI1WZY?list=PL_ib ... -Qgv1yoUqD

The late Bob Odegaard and his son Casey flying the FG-1D and P-51 respectively on those passes and hearing the howls of those planes is magical.
Image

User avatar
DHenriques_
A2A Chief Pilot
Posts: 5711
Joined: 27 Mar 2009, 08:31
Location: East Coast United States

Re: St Barts Landing

Post by DHenriques_ »

CAPFlyer wrote:Texas Flying Legends took their fleet down there, but no one was balls enough to actually try touching down. The show of them making high speed passes down the line and the runway was a much better show anyway. :)

"The Movie"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcpRYMa ... D&index=12

"From the Cockpit"
https://youtu.be/CcmE7QI1WZY?list=PL_ib ... -Qgv1yoUqD

The late Bob Odegaard and his son Casey flying the FG-1D and P-51 respectively on those passes and hearing the howls of those planes is magical.
Landing there requires a sign off from a Tradewinds CFI especially trained to teach both approaches. I remember the guys buzzing the place. Quite a show I heard.
DH

User avatar
CAPFlyer
A2A Aviation Consultant
Posts: 2241
Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 12:06
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA

Re: St Barts Landing

Post by CAPFlyer »

I meant no one had the balls to try and get the certification, and I meant it in jest. My understanding from Doug at the time was that they all took turns landing in the Cherokee Six they were using as the "Camera Ship" and got signed off, but even if the numbers said they could do it in a B-25, there was no question it wasn't going to be attempted.

They've kept it up too. Here's 2015 when they took Rod Lewis's 2 F7F Tigercats and his B-25 "Russian To Get Ya" in addition to TFL's Zero Replica, FG-1D, TBM-3E, P-40K, and B-25J "Betty's Dream".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-bEiW_L1Jg
Image

User avatar
Lewis - A2A
A2A Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 33321
Joined: 06 Nov 2004, 23:22
Location: Norfolk UK
Contact:

Re: St Barts Landing

Post by Lewis - A2A »

haha nice, if I ever tried that I'd be right in the drink :mrgreen:
A2A Facebook for news live to your social media newsfeed
A2A Youtube because a video can say a thousand screenshots,..
A2A Simulations Twitter for news live to your social media newsfeed
A2A Simulations Community Discord for voice/text chat

new reply

Return to “Lockheed Model 049 Constellation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 27 guests