VC autopilot option.

The "Queen of the Skies"
new reply
User avatar
Lufthansa 380
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 266
Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 16:46
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

VC autopilot option.

Post by Lufthansa 380 »

I know this is sort of an odd question but would it be possible to include a 3D model for the default fsx AP in the Virtual Cockpit of the Connie? Same place where the 3rd party GPS unit would be (above the glareshield). I am not asking for advanced gps functions, only standard alt hold, heading ad vs stuff you'll find in a C172. This would make flying the Connie on VATSIM or similar networks a bit easier.

User avatar
CAPFlyer
A2A Aviation Consultant
Posts: 2241
Joined: 03 Mar 2008, 12:06
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA

Re: VC autopilot option.

Post by CAPFlyer »

Sadly, no. The issue is that the model is already pushing the limits of what's acceptable in FSX/P3D so additional polys would push it over the limit.

Please understand that even though some polys are "removed" when changing options, you're actually only hiding them. They're still loaded into memory as part of the model even when they're not visible. This is what allows for the "hot switching" between options. Otherwise, you'd require a completely separate model for each variation on the cockpit and require you to reload each time you wanted to change the configuration.
Image

ApacheHunter
Airman
Posts: 46
Joined: 01 Jun 2012, 06:36

Re: VC autopilot option.

Post by ApacheHunter »

I found it very rewarding to learn to fly her without GPS, using radio navigation and even older methods. You won't be bored for a second!

Verstuurd vanaf mijn LG-H815 met Tapatalk

User avatar
Lufthansa 380
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 266
Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 16:46
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

Re: VC autopilot option.

Post by Lufthansa 380 »

Sure, flying her old school is certainly perfectly possible and a challenge but I find the autopilot to be mostly useless for precision flying. I find myself rather handflying and only using the pitch hold mode along with the trim, which again works perfectly fine. My only concern would be longer flights where you can't actually sit at your computer and make small corrections every couple minutes. I mean changes in wind or turbulence can all affect your flightpath.

Also - I am aware of the polygon count and how those on-the-fly options work but I wasn't aware that the VC model already pushes the limits? The performance is excellent.

User avatar
goughie
Airman First Class
Posts: 56
Joined: 26 Apr 2005, 16:42
Location: Bath U.K.

Re: VC autopilot option.

Post by goughie »

Hi , can I assume you are aware that you can fly a 'direct to' course with the existing nav options?

Cool
Airman First Class
Posts: 77
Joined: 01 Jul 2015, 09:43
Location: Paris, France
Contact:

Re: VC autopilot option.

Post by Cool »

Lufthansa 380 wrote:...I am not asking for advanced gps functions, only standard alt hold, heading ad vs stuff you'll find in a C172. This would make flying the Connie on VATSIM or similar networks a bit easier.
I use Saitek Multi Panel and it works like a charme with the Connie just like a C172 :wink:

Image
Image

User avatar
Lufthansa 380
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 266
Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 16:46
Location: Frankfurt, Germany

Re: VC autopilot option.

Post by Lufthansa 380 »

goughie wrote:Hi , can I assume you are aware that you can fly a 'direct to' course with the existing nav options?
Yes I am aware. Was only talking about some hands off flying - hence the newer AP option.

User avatar
bobsk8
Technical Sergeant
Posts: 900
Joined: 04 May 2015, 12:53
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: VC autopilot option.

Post by bobsk8 »

I use the sperry autopilot all the time and once one learns it, it works perfectly fine and is much more realistic than the FS AP.
MSFS 2020
ATC by PF3

Image

new reply

Return to “Lockheed Model 049 Constellation”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests