From AOPA 2002:
https://www.aopa.org/go-fly/aircraft-an ... r-comanche
"Most of the grumbling you hear about Comanches has to do with landings. Close to the runway, those laminar-flow wings ride deep in ground effect. If you're too fast, the airplane can float and float while you bleed off airspeed. Impatient pilots who try to force the airplane onto the runway at too high an airspeed can easily find themselves rewarded with wheelbarrowing on the nosewheel. The airplane has a large nosewheel (actually, it's the same size as the main gear) and, together with the main gears' stubby struts, the landing-gear geometry lends itself to nosewheel-first arrivals, premature liftoffs, and wheelbarrowing. The moral: Make sure you're at the proper airspeed and attitude the moment you touch down. Comanches can be cruel to the sloppy"
No crepe. First landing was exactly that...floating and floating and luckily I was slow enough that when I finally flared it sat well but there was maybe 300' of the runway left by the time I stopped.
Whew.
Oh, Tell Me About It
Oh, Tell Me About It
"Spring Chicken to Shite Hawk in one easy lesson...taka taka taka taka..."
- DHenriques_
- A2A Chief Pilot
- Posts: 5711
- Joined: 27 Mar 2009, 08:31
- Location: East Coast United States
Re: Oh, Tell Me About It
There's really nothing earth shattering about landing the Comanche. True, it has a high performance wing but you learn (or should be learning anyway) during your checkout in the airplane the in's and out's concerned with wing management.Taka taka wrote:From AOPA 2002:
https://www.aopa.org/go-fly/aircraft-an ... r-comanche
"Most of the grumbling you hear about Comanches has to do with landings. Close to the runway, those laminar-flow wings ride deep in ground effect. If you're too fast, the airplane can float and float while you bleed off airspeed. Impatient pilots who try to force the airplane onto the runway at too high an airspeed can easily find themselves rewarded with wheelbarrowing on the nosewheel. The airplane has a large nosewheel (actually, it's the same size as the main gear) and, together with the main gears' stubby struts, the landing-gear geometry lends itself to nosewheel-first arrivals, premature liftoffs, and wheelbarrowing. The moral: Make sure you're at the proper airspeed and attitude the moment you touch down. Comanches can be cruel to the sloppy"
No crepe. First landing was exactly that...floating and floating and luckily I was slow enough that when I finally flared it sat well but there was maybe 300' of the runway left.
Whew.
Landing the Comanche requires little more than flying a stabilized approach with proper airspeed and configuration through the threshold window over the end of the runway. Do that and the Comanche is a joy to land. Don't do that and you will have the same issues during the flare that these mistakes would affect any other airplane.
The thing with laminar wings is that during the flare they can stall quickly as they cross their CLmax threshold. The Mustang does the same thing if you're not careful.
The "trick" if indeed there is one, is to think ahead of the airplane during the approach, control the approach speed and just land the aircraft.
Dudley Henriques
Re: Oh, Tell Me About It
It floats and then if you have not cut your speed enough you are left with little runway and too much energy.
EVERY landing (5?) I have made is 'hot.'
I think more than anything this affirms the accurate simulation of this particular airframe.
To me this is a kudo.
EVERY landing (5?) I have made is 'hot.'
I think more than anything this affirms the accurate simulation of this particular airframe.
To me this is a kudo.
"Spring Chicken to Shite Hawk in one easy lesson...taka taka taka taka..."
- DHenriques_
- A2A Chief Pilot
- Posts: 5711
- Joined: 27 Mar 2009, 08:31
- Location: East Coast United States
Re: Oh, Tell Me About It
You're right. That's exactly what it is, and you are right also that the team worked very hard to replicate this fidelity in the Comanche.Taka taka wrote:It floats and then if you have not cut your speed enough you are left with little runway and too much energy.
EVERY landing (5?) I have made is 'hot.'
I think more than anything this affirms the accurate simulation of this particular airframe.
To me this is a kudo.
Dudley Henriques
Re: Oh, Tell Me About It
I have got the trim for landing worked out and now it is a breeze.
90 kias recommended, I get down to 80 with a notch of flaps as I cross the fence and it is more than docile.
90 kias recommended, I get down to 80 with a notch of flaps as I cross the fence and it is more than docile.
"Spring Chicken to Shite Hawk in one easy lesson...taka taka taka taka..."
- DHenriques_
- A2A Chief Pilot
- Posts: 5711
- Joined: 27 Mar 2009, 08:31
- Location: East Coast United States
Re: Oh, Tell Me About It
Good on ya! Just like the real one, all it takes is practice.Taka taka wrote:I have got the trim for landing worked out and now it is a breeze.
90 kias recommended, I get down to 80 with a notch of flaps as I cross the fence and it is more than docile.
Dudley Henriques
Re: Oh, Tell Me About It
It's challenging for sure. I'm so used to coming in hot in jets and turboprops. I died last night at Bryce Canyon airport after coming in too fast and trying to go around at the wrong time. It's weird because my landings have been okay for the few days I've had it. Nevertheless, still learning.
Chris J.
Asus Maximus VII Hero motherboard | Intel i7 4790k CPU | MSI GTX 970 4 GB video card | Corsair DDR3 2133 32GB SDRAM | Corsair H50 water cooler | Samsung 850 EVO 250GB SSD (2) | EVGA 1000 watt PSU | Windows & Pro 64 bit | FSX:SE
Asus Maximus VII Hero motherboard | Intel i7 4790k CPU | MSI GTX 970 4 GB video card | Corsair DDR3 2133 32GB SDRAM | Corsair H50 water cooler | Samsung 850 EVO 250GB SSD (2) | EVGA 1000 watt PSU | Windows & Pro 64 bit | FSX:SE
Re: Oh, Tell Me About It
Knots, or MPH..?Taka taka wrote:I have got the trim for landing worked out and now it is a breeze.
90 kias recommended, I get down to 80 with a notch of flaps as I cross the fence and it is more than docile.
- guillaume78150
- Staff Sergeant
- Posts: 467
- Joined: 08 Oct 2015, 06:07
- Location: North Burgundy
- Contact:
Re: Oh, Tell Me About It
80 mph.
Re: Oh, Tell Me About It
Are we sure..? Using kts would certainly explain the floating IGE... but then it is a MPH gauge.guillaume78150 wrote:80 mph.
Re: Oh, Tell Me About It
Knots indicated airspeed.
Yeah - 120 is HOT.
80 ~ 92 mph.
Yeah - 120 is HOT.
80 ~ 92 mph.
"Spring Chicken to Shite Hawk in one easy lesson...taka taka taka taka..."
Re: Oh, Tell Me About It
Yeah, I tend to think in knots even when the indicator is MPH.mallcott wrote:Are we sure..? Using kts would certainly explain the floating IGE... but then it is a MPH gauge.guillaume78150 wrote:80 mph.
"Spring Chicken to Shite Hawk in one easy lesson...taka taka taka taka..."
Re: Oh, Tell Me About It
Yes, but you can see it makes a difference when trying to seek help.Taka taka wrote:Yeah, I tend to think in knots even when the indicator is MPH.mallcott wrote:Are we sure..? Using kts would certainly explain the floating IGE... but then it is a MPH gauge.guillaume78150 wrote:80 mph.
Best to be accurate as it helps us get a handle on what is, and isn't, going on!
As I've said previously, I only use the numbers for the aircraft I'm in, it almost has no relevance if you are going`by the numbers` - unless you have a mixture in the flight docs like certain Pipers of my acquaintance, when a quick 20 minutes with a pen to convert the anomalous to the homogenous pays dividends in the air.
In the (even recent) past it DID make a much bigger difference as time-to-go and other clock-based calculations were done on a whizzwheel or calculator, and mistaking `nautical miles per hour` with `statute miles per hour` would throw off arrival times and navigation, leading to CFIT, airspace intrusion and other nastiness including `temporary loss of position`. Especially if one was head-down in the cockpit busily trying to convert rather than looking out the window to aviate, navigate and avoid.
But these days TTG or ETA can be got pretty accurately from GPS, FMS or even a simple app on a phone or tablet so the kts v. mph argument holds less weight than it used to, but still it's important for flight planning when most computational tools use kts/nautical miles as default. Where it still really matters is for troubleshooting and reporting.
I like the way A2A mixes it up on a per-aircraft basis. Reminds me to keep on my toes in the real world!
- guillaume78150
- Staff Sergeant
- Posts: 467
- Joined: 08 Oct 2015, 06:07
- Location: North Burgundy
- Contact:
Re: Oh, Tell Me About It
The 250's pilot's operating handbook recommends 82 mph/71 kt as a final approach speed, but if you've been doing 90 kt on base you'll be busy lowering flaps, S-turning, or using other techniques to both go down and slow down safely.
Re: Oh, Tell Me About It
The trick for me is lowering the throttle (one notch of flaps) enough that I am pulling the yoke hard to stay level.
That's 80 - 90 mph.
That's 80 - 90 mph.
"Spring Chicken to Shite Hawk in one easy lesson...taka taka taka taka..."
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests