Hello guys,
Just a quick one: should our KAP 140 autopilot installation be capable of following vertical guidance provided by an LPV or LNAV+V approach?
In my case, the GPS (RXP GNS 530W V2) is driving the glideslope pointers on the HSI as you'd expect, but the autopilot doesn't follow this glideslope deviation info.
I was initially under the mistaken impression that the autopilot was following vertical guidance from the GPS, but it turned out it was just intercepting the ILS glideslope which I had tuned into NAV1, even though the GNS unit was in GPS mode!
Just trying to distinguish between real limitation of this setup, and possible issues with the RXP GNS 530W V2 integration. (I know it's not officially supported yet...)
Thanks,
Nick
P.S. You'll have to excuse me: it's my first experience with a 'proper' GPS in the sim!
Quick question: LPV or LNAV+V approaches and the KAP 140
- Nick - A2A
- A2A Captain
- Posts: 13811
- Joined: 06 Jun 2014, 13:06
- Location: UK
Re: Quick question: LPV or LNAV+V approaches and the KAP 140
Yes the KAP 140 can follow this type of guidance as it really doesn't understand what the source of the navigation signal is from. As long as the signal and deviation is provided it will happily follow along.
I use a KAP140 to fly ILS and LPV approaches.
I do not know if the GPS would provide a vertical deviation signal and if it therefore appropriate for the autopilot to follow LNAV+V guidance as that is not guaranteed to provide obstacle clearance.
All said as an IFR student, not an IFR pilot!
I use a KAP140 to fly ILS and LPV approaches.
I do not know if the GPS would provide a vertical deviation signal and if it therefore appropriate for the autopilot to follow LNAV+V guidance as that is not guaranteed to provide obstacle clearance.
All said as an IFR student, not an IFR pilot!
Flight Simmer since 1983. PP ASEL IR Tailwheel
N28021 1979 Super Viking 17-30A
N28021 1979 Super Viking 17-30A
- Nick - A2A
- A2A Captain
- Posts: 13811
- Joined: 06 Jun 2014, 13:06
- Location: UK
Re: Quick question: LPV or LNAV+V approaches and the KAP 140
Thanks Oracle - I thought that was the case but wanted to make sure. From some of Esa's posts, I vaguely understand that the autopilot is just a slave to voltages from the CDI and glideslope needles, so it seemed logical that it should follow them regardless of whether they're being driven by ground-based navaids or the GPS. However, I wondered if in GPS mode, glideslope deviation info to the KAP 140 comes directly from the GTN.
Anyway, it looks like integration of the new RXP GTN isn't as smooth sailing as I'd first thought! I've had one LPV approach where the glideslope pointers never even appeared, and where they do, the autopilot doesn't follow them.
Thanks again and hope the instrument rating is going smoothly still.
Nick
P.S. Yeah, I appreciate that for LNAV+V approaches the vertical guidance is "advisory" only, but I understand the glideslope deviation is still presented via the HSI etc in the same way. That's certainly how it appears in the sim.
Anyway, it looks like integration of the new RXP GTN isn't as smooth sailing as I'd first thought! I've had one LPV approach where the glideslope pointers never even appeared, and where they do, the autopilot doesn't follow them.
Thanks again and hope the instrument rating is going smoothly still.
Nick
P.S. Yeah, I appreciate that for LNAV+V approaches the vertical guidance is "advisory" only, but I understand the glideslope deviation is still presented via the HSI etc in the same way. That's certainly how it appears in the sim.
Re: Quick question: LPV or LNAV+V approaches and the KAP 140
Good point on the HSI vertical guidance on LNAV+V.
I'm using a G1000 and it has a different presentation between LPV and LNAV+V. I have never tried to couple it with the guidance on LNAV+V because you'd have to keep switching modes to halt descent.
I have very little experience with LPV approaches because there aren't many around here and mostly at the airports I would not want to fly to.
I guess it would likely follow the vertical guidance all the way down on a mechanical HSI unit.
In the end what really matters is that you obey the crossing altitudes and properly identify the intersections. That is regardless of how you actually manage the descent, provided that it is a stable descent.
I'm using a G1000 and it has a different presentation between LPV and LNAV+V. I have never tried to couple it with the guidance on LNAV+V because you'd have to keep switching modes to halt descent.
I have very little experience with LPV approaches because there aren't many around here and mostly at the airports I would not want to fly to.
I guess it would likely follow the vertical guidance all the way down on a mechanical HSI unit.
In the end what really matters is that you obey the crossing altitudes and properly identify the intersections. That is regardless of how you actually manage the descent, provided that it is a stable descent.
Flight Simmer since 1983. PP ASEL IR Tailwheel
N28021 1979 Super Viking 17-30A
N28021 1979 Super Viking 17-30A
- Nick - A2A
- A2A Captain
- Posts: 13811
- Joined: 06 Jun 2014, 13:06
- Location: UK
Re: Quick question: LPV or LNAV+V approaches and the KAP 140
Though I could never bring myself to put modern avionics (i.e. touchscreen GTNs) into the A2A GA products, I'd love to get my hands on an A2A aircraft with native support for the G1000 PC trainer... In the (probably) unlikely event this ever happens...Oracle427 wrote:I'm using a G1000 and it has a different presentation between LPV and LNAV+V.
Nick
Re: Quick question: LPV or LNAV+V approaches and the KAP 140
One of the instructors at my flying club did a presentation about it a few years ago.
Maybe this has some helpful info for you.
http://flywithhoward.com/wp-content/upl ... proach.pdf
Maybe this has some helpful info for you.
http://flywithhoward.com/wp-content/upl ... proach.pdf
- Nick - A2A
- A2A Captain
- Posts: 13811
- Joined: 06 Jun 2014, 13:06
- Location: UK
Re: Quick question: LPV or LNAV+V approaches and the KAP 140
Thanks Brian - that presentation does indeed contain some very useful info. Reading about the "APR guidance available" message and the need to manually "enable A/P APR outputs" for each approach with vertical guidance made me wonder if the same is true of the GNS series.
And, sure enough, it is. (Page 114 of the pilot's guide if only I'd read that far!) However, I'm 99% certain that this message didn't appear during the approaches I've flown so I suspect this behaviour isn't active in the RXP product. I will double check my procedure though, and at least it gives me some extra info to get back to RXP with.
Cheers,
Nick
And, sure enough, it is. (Page 114 of the pilot's guide if only I'd read that far!) However, I'm 99% certain that this message didn't appear during the approaches I've flown so I suspect this behaviour isn't active in the RXP product. I will double check my procedure though, and at least it gives me some extra info to get back to RXP with.
Cheers,
Nick
Re: Quick question: LPV or LNAV+V approaches and the KAP 140
Nick,
To generalize: If the black box is able to drive the G/S needle, the autopilot is capable of coupling on to it. Exactly as Oracle mentioned in the first reply, it doesn't know what's driving that needle, it only follows it.
Now, there are exceptions. An obvious one would be if the box was coupled to a NAV display but was not connected to the autopilot. Your wiring may vary! RNAV, NAV, indicators, and the autopilot are all independent boxes, and may or may not be interconnected in various ways. A case study of this would be the GPSS simulation.
Edit: To be on it, the G/S and the GPS-based vertical share the signal if connected to the autopilot. If jumped from an indicator, the bets are off.
GNS systems are more or less similar.
-Esa
To generalize: If the black box is able to drive the G/S needle, the autopilot is capable of coupling on to it. Exactly as Oracle mentioned in the first reply, it doesn't know what's driving that needle, it only follows it.
Now, there are exceptions. An obvious one would be if the box was coupled to a NAV display but was not connected to the autopilot. Your wiring may vary! RNAV, NAV, indicators, and the autopilot are all independent boxes, and may or may not be interconnected in various ways. A case study of this would be the GPSS simulation.
Edit: To be on it, the G/S and the GPS-based vertical share the signal if connected to the autopilot. If jumped from an indicator, the bets are off.
GNS systems are more or less similar.
-Esa
- Nick - A2A
- A2A Captain
- Posts: 13811
- Joined: 06 Jun 2014, 13:06
- Location: UK
Re: Quick question: LPV or LNAV+V approaches and the KAP 140
Thanks Esa - I love a good system interface diagram!
This sort of thing does bring home the complexities of simulating this kind of set-up in the way A2A have chosen to do (creating their own autopilot simulation I mean), especially when products from different developers are brought into the mix.
I'm curious as to why the GNS/GTN + KAP 140/KFC 225 combination needs manual intervention by the pilot for each approach with vertical guidance, as discussed above. I mean, I appreciate the point in the presentation that the KAP 140 was designed before the advent of WAAS approaches, but if the firmware has been updated to take account of this, why not just automatically enable the vertical guidance to the autopilot on approaching the FAF?
Anyway, I think this is irrelevant to troubleshooting the issue with the RXP GNS. Presumablyâ€â€because it's autopilot-specificâ€â€this feature isn't included in the Garmin trainer at all.
Nick
This sort of thing does bring home the complexities of simulating this kind of set-up in the way A2A have chosen to do (creating their own autopilot simulation I mean), especially when products from different developers are brought into the mix.
I'm curious as to why the GNS/GTN + KAP 140/KFC 225 combination needs manual intervention by the pilot for each approach with vertical guidance, as discussed above. I mean, I appreciate the point in the presentation that the KAP 140 was designed before the advent of WAAS approaches, but if the firmware has been updated to take account of this, why not just automatically enable the vertical guidance to the autopilot on approaching the FAF?
Anyway, I think this is irrelevant to troubleshooting the issue with the RXP GNS. Presumablyâ€â€because it's autopilot-specificâ€â€this feature isn't included in the Garmin trainer at all.
Nick
Re: Quick question: LPV or LNAV+V approaches and the KAP 140
Hmm, I've had a pause since last using the Cessnas (been on the Comanche as a GA and busy with FSL for a while), but I recall I did some vertical guidance with autopilot, using F1 GTN650. Interesting.Nick M wrote:I'm curious as to why the GNS/GTN + KAP 140/KFC 225 combination needs manual intervention by the pilot for each approach with vertical guidance, as discussed above. I mean, I appreciate the point in the presentation that the KAP 140 was designed before the advent of WAAS approaches, but if the firmware has been updated to take account of this, why not just automatically enable the vertical guidance to the autopilot on approaching the FAF?
IRL, KAP 140 & GNS/GTN are not 1-to-1 compatible, for instance the proprietary GPSS input for KAP 140 would not accept any of the GNS/GTN outputs, so we'd be on the needles. Anything that goes to the "MAIN CDI/HSI" from the connector P1001 should be standard volt-or-not signals, and the autopilot should not know the difference.
I should check out the KAP 140 data as well, how one should properly interface these two. There are a few options from the above. Maybe tomorrow.
Edit: Re. all the developers making their addons into the mix, I'd love them to provide outputs in regular formats used in real things. It should not be too much to simulate today. For voltage signals, just give a byte or two.
-Esa
- Nick - A2A
- A2A Captain
- Posts: 13811
- Joined: 06 Jun 2014, 13:06
- Location: UK
Re: Quick question: LPV or LNAV+V approaches and the KAP 140
Yes, could be down to some differences in coding when it comes to the Flight 1 vs. Reality XP approach.AKar wrote:Hmm, I've had a pause since last using the Cessnas (been on the Comanche as a GA and busy with FSL for a while), but I recall I did some vertical guidance with autopilot, using F1 GTN650. Interesting.
For anyone considering the RXP GNS units, my advice would be to hold off for the moment if you plan to install them in your A2A aircraft. You can see the support thread I opened on the RXP forum on Avsim here; I'm still hopeful compatibility between the two products can be improved.
Nick
Re: Quick question: LPV or LNAV+V approaches and the KAP 140
Yeah, tbh all this addon avionics market is going towards a mess like faster than the Korean peninsula.
What should have been realized from the starters is that the signals utilized in the real world are fairly standard voltage signals, discrete or analog, OR, either standardized ARINC 429 or RS 232, OR, in cases something like MIL-STD-1553, OR, if else then proprietary.
The protocols and analog signals are mostly well-defined and public (or easily reversible). In principle, if one referred into these when doing a simulation, a simple table of inputs referring against the 'standard' would be required for good compatibility and it would remain somewhat future proof.
-Esa
What should have been realized from the starters is that the signals utilized in the real world are fairly standard voltage signals, discrete or analog, OR, either standardized ARINC 429 or RS 232, OR, in cases something like MIL-STD-1553, OR, if else then proprietary.
The protocols and analog signals are mostly well-defined and public (or easily reversible). In principle, if one referred into these when doing a simulation, a simple table of inputs referring against the 'standard' would be required for good compatibility and it would remain somewhat future proof.
-Esa
- Nick - A2A
- A2A Captain
- Posts: 13811
- Joined: 06 Jun 2014, 13:06
- Location: UK
Re: Quick question: LPV or LNAV+V approaches and the KAP 140
Just to revisit this topic, can any users of the RXP GNS V1 (or indeed Flight 1 GNS units) confirm if this functionality (the KAP 140 following vertical guidance for a RNAV approach) works OK?
Thanks,
Nick
Thanks,
Nick
- Nick - A2A
- A2A Captain
- Posts: 13811
- Joined: 06 Jun 2014, 13:06
- Location: UK
Re: Quick question: LPV or LNAV+V approaches and the KAP 140
A small update for anyone interested in the RealityXP GNS gauges. With the most recent RXP update released a couple of days ago, issues with the VOR1 to GPS connection have been resolved and the KAP 140 is now able to follow vertical guidance during LPV (etc.) approaches. Still more fun to be had doing it by hand, but good to know the new RXP gauge can be successfully integrated.
Nick
Nick
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests