question: what would it take to conver to 172sp

Post any technical issues here. This forum gets priority from our staff.
new reply
clmooring
Airman First Class
Posts: 72
Joined: 14 Dec 2012, 22:34

question: what would it take to conver to 172sp

Post by clmooring »

I love the 172r. but I was wondering what is required to convert this great add-on to a 172sp. Is it just some minor tweeks of engine perfomance and a new paint job? Or would it require far more work?

User avatar
Scott - A2A
A2A General
Posts: 16839
Joined: 11 Feb 2004, 12:55
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: question: what would it take to conver to 172sp

Post by Scott - A2A »

What engine performance tweaks are you speaking of?
A2A Simulations Inc.

clmooring
Airman First Class
Posts: 72
Joined: 14 Dec 2012, 22:34

Re: question: what would it take to conver to 172sp

Post by clmooring »

I understand that the primary difference between the 172r and the 172sp is that the sp has more engine horse power (mayb a 6 cyl instead of a 4 cyl).

of course interior upgrades.

chav241
Senior Airman
Posts: 180
Joined: 01 Dec 2010, 20:54
Location: Scotland EGPF

Re: question: what would it take to conver to 172sp

Post by chav241 »

I think using the other propeller provided gives you similar preformance to the sp(extra 20hp) be it a louder engine noise, thought I am no expert.

Think the C172r 160Hp (C172sp 180Hp oh and leather seats :lol: )

David
Windows 10
Intel Core i7-6700k @4.00GHz Ram 16GB GTX 980 Ti
FSX plus Acceleration
Piper cub - P47 Razorback - B377 Stratocruiser + COTS - B17 - Spitfire
C172 Trainer(TT65) Piper Cherokee(TT110) C182(TT08)

Brett_Henderson
Senior Airman
Posts: 248
Joined: 09 Jan 2009, 13:12

Re: question: what would it take to conver to 172sp

Post by Brett_Henderson »

The 'R' and the 'S' have the same engine.. (this is covered pretty well in the developmental videos) ..

Most of these light, GA engines are capable of delivering quite a bit more HP than their ratings. If your were to put, say, the engine at hand (IO-360) on a dyno, and test it like an automobile engine, you'd probably find that the HP peaks at over 3000rpm. There are a couple of reasons they aren't set up to run at high RPM..

1)Duty cylce .. they wouldn't last as long

2)Typical GA props (+\- 6 feet) will see their blade-tips reach super-sonic speeds near 3000rpm and become very inefficient (and very loud)

A C177rg gets a 200HP rating out of an IO-360.. mainly due to the constant-speed prop. An old trick (that I'll deny), was for a pilot to get his high-performance endorsement (greater than 200HP) in a C177rg, by having the prop governor set up for a slightly higher RPM..

ANYway.. the 180HP comes from a prop that allows the engine to operate at the higher, 2700RPM

clmooring
Airman First Class
Posts: 72
Joined: 14 Dec 2012, 22:34

Re: question: what would it take to conver to 172sp

Post by clmooring »

thanks for the feedback. Maybe one day a nice leather interior will show up. Until then, I will enthusiatically operating my 172R.

When you change the prop do the rpm range markings change

Brett_Henderson
Senior Airman
Posts: 248
Joined: 09 Jan 2009, 13:12

Re: question: what would it take to conver to 172sp

Post by Brett_Henderson »

When you change the prop do the rpm range markings change

Yes..

new reply

Return to “C172 Trainer Tech Support”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests