The A2A Simulations Community

"Come share your passion for flight"
It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 11:39 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:47 am 
Offline
Senior Airman

Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:45 pm
Posts: 156
This is the first in-cockpit Kent Spitfire (TA805) video I’ve seen. The sound of the Merlin is pretty good in this one.

http://youtu.be/k7TV_zqWGG4


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:16 am 
Offline
Senior Airman
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 10:52 am
Posts: 201
Location: South Coast, England.
Great footage, beautifully void of any 'music', other than that made by the Merlin.

L-4 in the hangar there too.

_________________
~ Make love to the sky, don't shag it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:39 am 
Offline
Technical Sergeant
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 7:13 am
Posts: 878
Location: bristol uk
Boreas.

Lovely video,loved the barrel rolls,the merlin doesn't sound the same in the cockpit as it does outside the cockpit,but when you hear that engine in the sky,it's poetry in motion,never to be forgotten,the best sound in the world,pure magic.

_________________
you live and learn,and die and forget.

CPU Intel E8400 Core 2 Duo@3.00ghz O/C@4.00GHZ.2GB CRUCIAL MEM 6400,V/C Ati 6870 1GB mem,MB GA- p35ds3r,s/c 5.1 santa cruz,Viewsonic 2650 LCD 26" Screen


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 3:42 pm 
Offline
Senior Airman

Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:45 pm
Posts: 156
I agree. The only thing better than one Merlin is two or two dozen so there is that rhythmic thrumming.

The video shows the greenish colour of the armoured glass as per Hazzie’s cool mod for the external modal. It would be nice to see that in a sim as quick check didn't find any that have this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:31 am 
Offline
Airman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:21 am
Posts: 16
Location: Canberra, Australia
Wonderful. Why didn't the engine splutter while he was performing the rolls? Did they solve this problem by this Mk?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:43 am 
Offline
Senior Airman
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 10:52 am
Posts: 201
Location: South Coast, England.
He brings the nose above the horizon prior to initiating the maneuver, and so this allows him to maintain some level of back pressure on the stick through the roll, which will lessen the amount of time the aircraft is unloaded, if at all. Also he's only inverted for a very short period of time.

_________________
~ Make love to the sky, don't shag it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 6:18 am 
Offline
Senior Airman

Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:45 pm
Posts: 156
I think it was only the MKI where presumably the supercharger required 1G or more down on its vertical axis, until Mrs Bennett’s invention showed the way. I guess with the MKI the engine might not stutter in a high energy roll if near enough 1G can be maintained throughout. This a later MKIX though.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:23 pm 
Offline
Airman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:21 am
Posts: 16
Location: Canberra, Australia
Found this on Wikipedia @ Rolls-Royce Merlin:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_Merlin

Carburettor developments

The use of carburettors was calculated to give a higher specific power output, due to the lower temperature, hence greater density, of the fuel/air mixture compared to injected systems. However, the Merlin's float controlled carburettor meant that both Spitfires and Hurricanes were unable to pitch nose down into a steep dive. The contemporary Bf 109E, which had direct fuel injection, could "bunt" into a high-power dive to escape attack, leaving the pursuing aircraft behind because its fuel had been forced out of the carburettor's float chamber by the effects of negative g-force (g). RAF fighter pilots soon learned to "half-roll" their aircraft before diving to pursue their opponents. "Miss Shilling's orifice", a holed diaphragm fitted across the float chambers, went some way towards curing the fuel starvation in a dive; however, at less than maximum power a "fuel rich" mixture still resulted. Another improvement was made by moving the fuel outlet from the bottom of the S.U. carburettor to exactly halfway up the side, which allowed the fuel to flow equally well under negative or positive g.

Further improvements were introduced throughout the Merlin range: 1943 saw the introduction of a Bendix-Stromberg pressure carburettor that injected fuel at 5 pounds per square inch (34 kPa; 0.34 bar) through a nozzle directly into the supercharger, and was fitted to Merlin 66, 70, 76, 77 and 85 variants. The final development, which was fitted to the 100-series Merlins, was an S.U. injection carburettor that injected fuel into the supercharger using a fuel pump driven as a function of crankshaft speed and engine pressures.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 26, 2012 7:38 am 
Offline
Senior Airman

Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:45 pm
Posts: 156
Thanks. That’s the first time I’ve looked at any detail on how the diaphragm worked. It’s a good job they didn’t use the Bennett contraption I somehow recalled anyway :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:36 am 
Offline
Airman

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 1:51 pm
Posts: 25
Ah, that's my usual take off route out of Biggin; out to 2 miles followed by a left turn towards Sevenoaks, sadly all in a PA28 and with no aerobatics... But still cool nonetheless.

:D


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group